Author: admin

  • Live updates: Trump news; House passes funding bill as Ukraine accepts ceasefire proposal – CNN

    Live updates: Trump news; House passes funding bill as Ukraine accepts ceasefire proposal – CNN

    Live Updates

    Trump’s presidency: Canada’s retaliatory tariffs, Ukraine war talks and a looming government shutdown

    imposes sweeping 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum, Mark Carney, leader of Canada’s ruling Liberal Party, told workers at a steel mill in Hamilton, Ontario that the country’s leadership was ready to sit down with the US “under a position where there’s respect for Canadian sovereignty.”

    ” data-duration=”00:39″ data-source-html=” – Source: CNN ” data-fave-thumbnails=”{“big”: { “uri”: “https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/carney-trump-tariffs-0312-split.jpg?c=16×9&q=h_540,w_960,c_fill” }, “small”: { “uri”: “https://media.cnn.com/api/v1/images/stellar/prod/carney-trump-tariffs-0312-split.jpg?c=16×9&q=h_540,w_960,c_fill” } }” data-vr-video=”false” data-show-html=”” data-byline-html=”

    ” data-timestamp-html=”

    Updated 5:00 PM EDT, Wed March 12, 2025

    ” data-check-event-based-preview data-is-vertical-video-embed data-network-id data-publish-date=”2025-03-12T17:00:52.553Z” data-video-section=”world” data-canonical-url=”https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/world/video/mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-branding-key data-video-slug=”mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-first-publish-slug=”mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-video-tags=”canada,tariffs,mark carney,digvid,digital” data-breakpoints=”{“video-resource–media-extra-large”: 660}” data-display-video-cover=”true” data-details data-track-zone=”live-story-lede” data-sticky-anchor-pos=”bottom”>

    imposes sweeping 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum, Mark Carney, leader of Canada’s ruling Liberal Party, told workers at a steel mill in Hamilton, Ontario that the country’s leadership was ready to sit down with the US “under a position where there’s respect for Canadian sovereignty.”

    ” data-check-event-based-preview data-network-id data-publish-date=”2025-03-12T17:00:52.553Z” data-video-section=”world” data-canonical-url=”https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/12/world/video/mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-branding-key data-video-slug=”mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-first-publish-slug=”mark-carney-canada-ready-to-sit-down-with-trump-tariffs-digvid” data-video-tags=”canada,tariffs,mark carney,digvid,digital”> Carney Trump Tariffs 0312 SPLIT.jpg

    Canada’s Carney discusses conditions for Trump talks

    00:39 – Source: CNN

    Canada’s Carney discusses conditions for Trump talks

    00:39

    • Looming shutdown deadline: Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said today that Democrats have the votes to block the House-passed GOP spending bill and called on Republicans to cut a deal to avert a shutdown Friday night.

    • Sweeping tariffs: President Donald Trump has imposed a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports. The European Union and Canada quickly responded with retaliatory levies. The escalation comes as a new CNN poll shows Americans are not impressed with Trump’s handling of the economy.

    • Judge rules on law firm: A federal judge halted parts of Trump’s executive order that targeted a Democratic-linked law firm. US District Judge Beryl Howell sided with the firm Perkins Coie, which represented Hillary Clinton in 2016 and has been involved in election litigation that Trump opposed.

    • Ukraine war talks: Trump said today that the ball is now in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s court after Ukraine accepted a US-proposed 30-day ceasefire.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer speaks on the Senate floor on Wednesday.

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Democrats have the votes to block the House-passed GOP spending bill. It is his first statement about his party’s strategy ahead of the Friday shutdown deadline.

    Schumer called on Senate Republicans to cut a deal with Democrats on a short-term spending bill instead, while they continue negotiating full-year appropriations.

    The House-passed bill would keep the government open until September. Senate Republicans are expected to reject Democrats’ attempts to pass their own short-term stopgap bill.

    Earlier this afternoon: Senate Democrats engaged in an animated debate behind closed doors over how to handle the House’s government funding bill. The meeting lasted for more than an hour.

    They were debating whether to supply the votes for a bill or block it and risk what could be a prolonged shutdown. Some Democrats are also pushing for bill that would keep the government funded for 30 days while a long-term solution is worked out.

    Ukraine’s plan of using Russia’s Kursk region as a bargaining tool in negotiations has collapsed, Russia’s top general, Valery Gerasimov, claimed Wednesday.

    Russia has reclaimed 86% of the area and hundreds of Ukrainian soldiers have been taken prisoner in the region, Gerasimov claimed as President Vladimir Putin was making his first visit to the region since Ukraine’s incursion in August last year.

    Ukrainian troops in the region have been surrounded, Gerasimov also claimed.

    CNN cannot independently verify the general’s claims.

    Putin said the goal is to “completely liberate” the region as soon as possible and raised the possibility of creating a “buffer zone” along Russia’s border with Ukraine.

    Appearing on Russian state television dressed in military uniform, Putin also said all Ukrainian soldiers captured in Kursk will be treated as terrorists.

    Some background: Ukraine launched its shock incursion into Kursk in August, swiftly capturing territory in what was the first ground invasion of Russia by a foreign power since World War II. As well as capturing land that could potentially be swapped for Russian-occupied territory, the campaign aimed to divert Moscow’s resources from the front lines in the east. But since then, Ukraine has struggled to hold onto its captured territory, with its grip on the region rapidly deteriorating in recent days.

    What Ukraine is saying: Moscow is using airborne troops and special operations forces to push Ukrainian troops out of Kursk, and has carried out air strikes on its own land, Oleksandr Syrskyi, commander-in-chief of Ukraine’s army, said in a post on Telegram. Russia is attempting to break through Ukrainian defenses in Kursk and move the fighting to the northeastern Ukrainian regions of Sumy and Kharkiv, he said. His priority is to save his soldiers’ lives even if it means maneuvering them into “more favorable positions” while continuing to hold defense in Kursk for as long as it’s appropriate, he said.

    This post was updated with a statement from Ukraine’s military leadership.

    US intelligence sharing has fully resumed and American weapons are flowing into Ukraine again after Tuesday’s meeting between US and Ukrainian representatives in Saudi Arabia, according to a US official.

    Some of these weapons were held in Poland before they had entered into Ukraine. On Tuesday night, Poland’s Secretary of State in the Ministry of National Defense Pawel Zalewski, said on social media that the weapons in Rzeszow near the border with Ukraine had started moving again.

    US contractors who are in Ukraine to help with maintenance, training and support on the country’s more complex weapons systems have also resumed their work, the official said. It is not clear if they were compelled to leave the country as part of the pause in aid or if they remained in Ukraine.

    In this photo released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting with students, in Tehran, Iran, on Wednesday.

    Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has dismissed US President Donald Trump’s offer to open negotiations on Tehran’s nuclear program.

    Trump told Fox News last week that he had written a letter to Khamenei, telling the network, “there are two ways Iran can be handled: militarily, or you make a deal. I would prefer to make a deal, because I’m not looking to hurt Iran.”

    “I said, ‘I hope you’re going to negotiate, because it’s going to be a lot better for Iran,’ and I think they want to get that letter — the alternative is we have to do something, because you can’t let them have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said.

    The Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said earlier on Wednesday that a letter from Trump would soon be delivered to Tehran by an Arab country, but that the letter “has not yet reached us.”

    Khamenei told the students he had not personally received a letter from Trump yet.

    Some context: Tehran, which has long insisted its nuclear program is peaceful, has expressed increasing skepticism about diplomacy with the US since the Trump administration withdrew in 2018 from the Iran nuclear deal signed three years earlier by Iran and six other countries.

    Khamenei’s comments also targeted domestic critics who have called for renewed engagement with Washington to ease economic sanctions. “If the goal of negotiations is to lift sanctions, then dialogue with this administration will not lead to that. Rather, it will make the sanctions more complicated and impose more pressure,” Khamenei said.

    Drivers sit in traffic on southbound Interstate 5 during the afternoon commute heading into downtown San Diego on May 29, in San Diego, California.

    The Trump administration is rolling back several major climate policies, including two rules that target planet-warming pollution from vehicles and power plants, in a major blow to America’s effort to address the causes of climate change.

    The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced Wednesday it will undo a vehicle pollution rule the Biden administration finalized in March 2024, which — by mandating less pollution from cars — would have pushed US automakers to produce more electric vehicles and fuel-efficient hybrid models that run on a mixture of gas and small batteries.

    “The American auto industry has been hamstrung by the crushing regulatory regime of the last administration,” EPA administrator Lee Zeldin said, adding the Trump administration “will abide by the rule of law to protect consumer choice and the environment.”

    The administration also plans to dismantle a Biden-era rule that compelled coal and new natural gas power plants to either cut or capture 90% of their climate pollution by 2032.

    Zeldin went as far as to recall the Obama administration’s power plant rule, saying in a statement that Trump “promised to kill the Clean Power Plan in his first term, and we continue to build on that progress now.”

    Additionally, Trump’s EPA is preparing to reconsider and strike down a consequential scientific finding that has served as the basis of federal regulations to curb climate pollution. Dismissing the precedent would strip the EPA’s authority to manage the pollution that causes global warming.

    This post has been updated with additional information about the rules set to be undone and comments from Zeldin.

    The White House today declined to say if the Trump administration has any enforcement mechanism in place in case Russia breaks a US-proposed ceasefire with Ukraine.

    “Well, that’s obviously a grand hypothetical question that I won’t comment on, because we’re not there yet,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters at the White House following a Fox interview.

    Leavitt said that national security adviser Mike Waltz spoke with his Russian counterpart earlier today, and that Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is traveling to Moscow this week to urge Russia to sign on to the plan. She described the state of negotiations as “on the tenth yard line of peace” and said it is now “up to the Russians to agree to this plan.”

    But she declined to say if President Donald Trump planned to call Russian President Vladimir Putin in an effort to exert direct pressure to commit to the ceasefire.

    “I don’t have a readout on the the president’s calls, but as the president always does, if that call happens, he will let you guys know,” Leavitt said.

    Asked if he planned to speak with Putin this week to discuss the ceasefire proposal, Trump told reporters at the White House on Tuesday, “I think so, yes.”

    President Donald Trump has imposed sweeping 25% tariffs on all steel and aluminum imported into the United States.

    In total, the US imported $31.3 billion worth of iron and steel and $27.4 billion of aluminum last year, according to data from the US Commerce Department. (The government data groups iron and steel together.)

    Canada was the top source of iron, steel and aluminum sent to the US last year, with the US importing $11.4 billion worth of aluminum and $7.6 billion worth of iron and steel from there.

    Here’s a breakdown of where it comes from:

    CNN’s Elisabeth Buchwald contributed reporting.

    President Donald Trump is forging ahead with his tariff strategy, imposing a new 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports. The European Union responded will billions of dollars in countermeasures, while Canada announced 25% retaliatory tariffs on about $20 billion of US imports.

    A 56% majority of the public disapproves of Trump’s handling of the economy, worse than at any point during his first term in office, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.

    The president’s aggressive and volatile trade policy is also creating a growing concern on Wall Street. Economists at JPMorgan Chase say there’s a roughly 40% chance the US economy stumbles into a recession this year due to “extreme” policies.

    Here’s what some experts are saying:

    • Possibility of recession: JPMorgan economists wrote in a note to clients on Friday that they “see a material risk (40%) that the US falls into recession this year owing to extreme US policies.” That’s up from JPMorgan’s previous forecast of a 30% risk of a recession when the year started. Bruce Kasman, chief economist and head of global economic research at JPMorgan, on Wednesday said risks would likely rise to 50% or higher if Trump’s planned reciprocal tariffs meaningfully come into force, Reuters reported.
    • Other similar forecasts: Former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers told CNN on Monday it’s “getting close to 50/50” that there will be a 2025 US recession. Kent Smetters, faculty director of the nonpartisan Penn Wharton Model, said it’s a “toss-up” at this point whether there will be a recession. Goldman Sachs raised its recession odds on Friday due to tariffs, but the Wall Street firm only sees a 20% chance of a downturn over the next 12 months, up from 15%.
    • Business leaders also feeling less confident: The CEO Economic Outlook Index released by the Business Roundtable dropped by seven points during the first quarter. The dip was tied to several factors, “including signs of economic headwinds and an atmosphere of uncertainty in Washington,” Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten said. The survey found that CEOs have sharply cut their plans for hiring and also indicated scaled-back plans for capital investment and sales expectations.

    CNN’s Elise Hammond and Ariel Edwards-Levy contributed to this post.

    President Donald Trump speaks while meeting with Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin in the Oval Office of the White House on Wednesday.

    President Donald Trump defended his shifting timeline on tariffs as a sign of “flexibility,” rather than “inconsistency,” but warned of “very little flexibility” after April 2, the date the administration said reciprocal tariff actions will be announced across many countries.

    Referring to his exemption on auto tariffs for one month, after a conversation with the Big Three automakers, Trump said he did them “a favor” so they wouldn’t be “driven into a little bit of a disaster.”

    “They actually love what I’m doing, but they had a problem,” Trump said. “I’m not like a block that just, ‘I won’t delay.’ I have, it’s called flexibility. It’s not called inconsistency.”

    While Trump said that “flexibility” will remain as his ongoing view toward tariffs, he said that changes in April.

    President Donald Trump speaks to the press during his meeting with Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin in the Oval Office of the White House on Wednesday.

    President Donald Trump again tried to insult Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Wednesday by calling him “a Palestinian.”

    The New York Democrat is the highest-ranking Jewish official in the country.

    “We are planning to lower taxes, yeah, if the Democrats behave, but the Democrats have no clue,” Trump said during a bilateral meeting with Irish Taoiseach Micheál Martin from the Oval Office. “You’re going to have some very bad things happen, and people are going to blame the Democrats, and Schumer is a Palestinian, as far as I’m concerned,” the president added.

    “You know, he’s become a Palestinian, he used to be Jewish, he’s not Jewish anymore, he’s a Palestinian,” Trump said.

    Throughout his 2024 campaign, Trump repeatedly attacked Schumer for his criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s handling of the war in Gaza. Trump falsely said the senator was “like a Palestinian” and claimed he was a “proud member of Hamas.”

    In February after retaking office, Trump claimed in a Truth Social post that Gaza would be handed over to the US “at the conclusion of the fighting,” and added that “the Palestinians, people like Chuck Schumer,” would be resettled.

    President Donald Trump meets with Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC, on March 12.

    A goodwill St. Patrick’s Day visit to the White House by Ireland’s leader could not avoid the ongoing trade tensions that have been roiling markets and causing strain, even with the staunchest of US allies.

    Sitting alongside Taoiseach Micheál Martin in the Oval Office, Trump accused the European Union — of which Ireland is a member — of treating the US “very badly.” And he lamented Ireland’s use of tax policies to lure away American drug-makers.

    The object of his ire was not necessarily his guest, who sat alongside the president and mostly listened, a sprig of shamrock pinned to his jacket.

    “I’m not upset with you,” Trump clarified.

    Martin did interject to list Irish companies that have created American jobs, including the low-cost carrier Ryanair, which has purchased airplanes from Boeing. The president seemed mildly interested, but responded by noting the “massive deficit” that still exists between the US and Ireland.

    “We do have a massive deficit with Ireland because Ireland was very smart,” Trump said. “They took our pharmaceutical companies away from presidents that didn’t know what they were doing and it’s too bad that happened.”

    Ireland has long leaned on favorable corporate tax structures and exports to drive growth. But Trump said the US should have responded with tariffs to protect US workers.

    “I have great respect for Ireland and what they did. And they should have done just what they did, but the United States shouldn’t have let that happen,” he said.

    Asked if Ireland was taking advantage of the US, Trump suggested the answer was obvious.

    “Of course they are,” he said.

    President Donald Trump reacts during a meeting with Irish Taoiseach Micheal Martin, with Vice President JD Vance sitting near them, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, DC, on March 12.

    President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the ball is in Russian President Vladimir Putin’s court after Ukraine accepted a US-proposed 30-day ceasefire on Tuesday.

    “We’re going to have to see. It’s up to Russia now,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office when asked if he had a meeting or call scheduled with Putin, adding that US representatives are headed to Russia “right now as we speak.”

    He declined to comment on whether he has a meeting with Putin scheduled.

    Special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff is expected to travel to Russia later this week, though it is unclear whether he plans to meet with Putin, with whom he met last month. Vice President JD Vance, speaking in the Oval Office, noted that conversations are happening “on the phone and in person with some of our representatives over the next couple of days.”

    Pressed on whether he believed Putin would keep a ceasefire given he’s broken them in the past, Trump said, “We haven’t spoken to him yet, with substance, because we just found out and we just were able to get Ukraine to agree. We’re going to know very soon. I’ve gotten some positive messages, but a positive message means nothing.”

    Trump reiterated his belief that Ukraine has been “the more difficult party.” But when asked, he also said he could slap additional sanctions on Russia, though suggested he does not want to do so.

    “There are things you could do that wouldn’t be pleasant, in the financial sense. I can do things financially that would be very bad for Russia. I don’t want to do that because I want to get peace, I want to see peace,” he said, adding, “We are getting close to getting something done.”

    A man walks past the U.S. Department of Education on December 6, 2024, in Washington, D.C.

    President Donald Trump praised his Department of Education Secretary Linda McMahon as the agency is slashing nearly half of its workforce, claiming his administration is “keeping the best people,” while cutting those he claims have poor performance or don’t show up to work.

    Asked if he feels any responsibility toward the civil servants who have lost their jobs, Trump offered some sympathy before quickly claiming without evidence that many of them don’t work.

    “We’re keeping the best people. And Linda McMahon is a real professional, very actually, very sophisticated businessperson. She cut a large number, but she kept the best people, and we’ll see how it all works out,” he said.

    McMahon, a Republican donor and former pro-wrestling executive, previously served as Small Business administrator during the first Trump term and board chair of the America First Policy Institute.

    Reiterating his goal to eliminate the Department of Education entirely, Trump said he wants to give individual states and parents power over education.

    Trump also praised the education systems of other countries, including Norway, Demark, Sweden, Finland and China.

    The Trump administration is running out of funding for its deportation efforts as it burns through resources at a rapid clip.

    The chair of the House appropriations subcommittee that oversees the Department of Homeland Security’s budget told CNN that the administration has approximately 60 days left if deportations continue at the current rate.

    “We’re running out of money,” GOP Rep. Mark Amodei of Nevada told CNN. “You can’t sustain the operations at the level they’ve established without giving them more resources.”

    The warning underscores that the GOP effort to dramatically increase funding to the Department of Homeland Security is separate from the party’s effort to slash the federal government and its workforce.

    Amodei said he has presented the prospect of the dwindling funds to House GOP leadership, and it will be up to them to decide what’s next. But there are no quick fixes or easy solutions.

    The question will be whether Republicans try to provide an emergency supplemental before the 60 days are up, or if leadership waits until Congress moves on a big bill encompassing President Donald Trump’s agenda in the coming months.

    Amodei said the 45,000 available beds allocated for migrants are full and the administration can’t cycle them through fast enough to keep up with the number of deportations they are aiming for.

    Immigration and Customs Enforcement has arrested nearly 33,000 migrants in the United States since President Donald Trump returned to the White House, nearly outpacing the number of interior arrests in the last fiscal year under former President Joe Biden, according to senior Homeland Security officials.

    ICE — the enforcement arm at the Department of Homeland Security — has been under immense pressure to ramp up arrests of undocumented immigrants in the United States, resulting in tense calls with the White House and infighting among officials. But in doing so, they’re also grappling with “maxed out” detention space, according to a senior ICE official.

    “We are maxed out. We’re at 47,600,” the senior ICE official said, adding that the agency is looking to grow its detention space. ICE detention space is at roughly 120%, according to internal data shared with CNN.

    In Trump’s first 50 days, from January 20 to March 10, ICE made 32,809 arrests, according to agency officials. The breakdown of those arrests includes:

    • 14,111 were convicted criminals
    • 9,980 had pending criminal charges
    • 8,718 had other immigration violations

    Some of those arrested have been released at the direction of judges or over medical or humanitarian concerns, though it’s unclear how many. Officials told reporters that those decisions are made at the senior level.

    In fiscal year 2024, ICE conducted 33,243 at-large arrests, meaning that they were done in the community. Agency officials didn’t share how many of the arrests made in the last 50 days were at-large arrests. They also didn’t share deportation numbers.

    Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said her country would wait until April 2 to determine if it will respond to US tariffs on aluminum and steel.

    US President Donald Trump had agreed to delay tariffs on all products from Mexico and Canada that are covered by the USMCA free trade treaty until April 2. That is also the date his administration said reciprocal tariff actions would be announced across many countries.

    Sheinbaum said her economy secretary would work with his American counterpart until then to “address how April 2 will unfold.”

    Asked if her government had a plan in place for imposing retaliatory tariffs, should they become necessary, Sheinbaum replied: “Yes, yes, we are working on it, and there is also a very good relationship with all steel producers and all those involved in aluminum production. So, we are working with them, with the national producers, and waiting for April 2 to make a definitive decision.”

    Senate Republicans on Wednesday said they understand their constituents’ uneasiness over the impacts of President Donald Trump’s new tariffs, urging the president to provide more clarity on his policies to help ease the uncertainty Americans are feeling.

    Trump imposed a sweeping 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imported into the United States on Wednesday, a move that threatens to drive up prices on a broad range of consumer and industrial goods for Americans.

    Sen. Shelley Moore Capito of West Virginia said she knows there is concern among consumers and businesses about the impact of tariffs on prices, but “right now, I’m urging calm.”

    She said her message is: “Let’s see how this plays out because I think the president’s on the right track in terms of making sure that America really has the best seat at the table.”

    Capito told CNN that “uncertainty’s never good for anybody,” and said she would tell Trump himself to “sort of calm the waters” and indicate “when he thinks this will settle.”

    Sen. Todd Young of Indiana said he agrees the Trump administration “rightly takes the view” that the US has been on the “receiving end of a lot of provocative trade activity over the years, and it’s time America fires a shot,” but he thinks more “clarity” should be provided on Trump’s new trade policies.

    “I’ve called for more clarity to be brought to individual tariff lines, so that our farmers and manufacturers know how long this is going to last, what exactly the tariff structure is going to look like,” he said, adding he thinks it’s “really important that we have certainty.”

    Young said he hopes the US can negotiate a “positive outcome” and eventually roll back on some of the newly imposed tariffs, “as opposed to keep them where they are initially.”

    A federal judge expressed skepticism Wednesday with how the Trump administration went about firing thousands of probationary employees, saying that while mass terminations may be within President Donald Trump’s discretion, he must do so in ways that comply with the law.

    Bredar is considering whether to issue a temporary restraining order in a case brought by several Democratic states who allege that the administration broke the law by not giving states proper notice before laying off the employees.

    Key to the dispute is whether the terminations followed the rules that allow for probationary employees to be quickly terminated — rules that would require a individualize reason for the firing, like a substandard performance by the employee –— or if the layoffs were in effect a so-called “Reduction In Force” that usually requires, under law, a 60 day notice.

    Justice Department attorney Eric Hamilton could not answer the judge’s questions about how many probationary employees had been laid off at the relevant agencies, nor would he answer when Bredar asked if it was more or less than 50, or 100.

    The judge asked if anyone in the federal government had that information, to which Hamilton replied that he did not know.

    Bredar, an Obama appointee, did not say how he intended to rule at the end of the hearing, but promised that a written opinion would come quickly.

    Canada Liberal Leader Mark Carney talks to media as he leaves a caucus meeting in Ottawa, Canada, on March 10.

    Canada’s Prime Minister Designate Mark Carney said he is ready to meet with US President Donald Trump, but he wants America to respect its northern neighbor’s sovereignty.

    Carney said Canada has come to the table to meet Trump’s demands to curtail the amount of fentanyl coming over the border. Federal statistics show Canada makes up just .2% of US border fentanyl seizures.

    “We respect his concern about fentanyl; it’s an issue for us here in Canada as well,” Carney said. “And that’s why the Canadian government moved very quickly a comprehensive response that’s had a huge, huge impact in terms of controlling that issue and getting on top of that issue much better.”

    Carney called for a renewal of the “greatest economic and security partnership in the world,” and a solution that would leave both Canadian and American workers better off.

    Meanwhile, Canada has retaliated against the United States’ latest tariff escalation by imposing 25% tariffs on a variety of goods, including steel and aluminum.

    While Carney has taken over as Liberal Party leader in Canada, Justin Trudeau will remain prime minister for an as-yet undisclosed transitional period while his successor settles in.

    President Donald Trump meets with Irish Prime Minister Micheal Martin in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on March 12.

    When the Irish Taoiseach, or prime minister, visits Washington around St. Patrick’s Day every year, it’s not normally an occasion for tension. Instead, it’s usually a moment to mark close ties between the countries, illustrated annually by the presentation of a crystal bowl of shamrocks.

    Yet like so many traditions in the Donald Trump era, Wednesday’s visit will come against a strained backdrop. The European Union, of which Ireland is a member, announced plans to hit back on US metal tariffs in the hours ahead of Taoiseach Micheál Martin’s arrival for talks with Trump.

    The budding trade war is only the start of the Trump administration’s fraught relationship with Europe. The president has also castigated longstanding American allies for not doing enough on Ukraine, and has demanded European countries increase their defense spending. And his plan to redevelop Gaza into a “Riviera” resort has caused fury among the Irish, who hold historic sympathies toward Palestinians.

    Martin, an experienced diplomat who previously served as Ireland’s foreign affairs minister, is unlikely to enter the meeting looking for a fight. But even he faced pressure from the Irish public ahead of his trip to Washington, with some calling on him to cancel the visit altogether.

    Ireland has not historically found itself subject to Trump’s ire. In remarks alongside Vice President JD Vance ahead of his White House meetings, Martin praised the US as a broker for peace, harkening to the US-led peace talks that resulted in the 1998 Good Friday agreement that ended decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland.

    “We know that building peace is a difficult and painstaking task. We are ready to play our part in supporting work to end conflict and to secure peace, whether in the Middle East or in Ukraine,” he said.

  • Immigrant detention centers are at capacity, Trump admin officials say – NBC News

    Immigrant detention centers are at capacity, Trump admin officials say – NBC News

    The Department of Homeland Security says its immigrant detention centers are at capacity, housing about 47,600 individuals.

    Speaking to reporters Wednesday on background, DHS officials said they are working with the Marshals Service, Department of Defense and Federal Bureau of Prisons to increase bed space as they ask Congress for more funding.

    Arrested individuals are also being released from detention on a case-by-case basis using ICE’s Alternatives to Detention program based on medical or humanitarian concerns, they said.

    The senior DHS and ICE officials also provided new arrest data cataloging Trump’s first 50 days back in office. According to DHS data, from Jan. 20 to March 10, 2025 ICE has arrested 32,809 individuals.

    According to officials, of those, 14,111 were convicted criminals, 9,980 have pending criminal charges and 8,718 have only immigration-related violations.

    “We expect these ICE arrests and removal numbers will only go up as we unleash an agency that has had its hands tied behind its back for the past four years,” said acting ICE Director Todd Lyons. “These ICE enforcement operations are not only removing criminals from the American communities, but they are also discouraging people from coming to our country illegally.”

    In terms of those with suspected ties to criminal organizations using the same time frame, officials said ICE had arrested 1,155 suspected gang members and 39 known or suspected terrorists.

    DHS did not say on the call how many people have been deported under the new Trump administration.

    On Monday, NBC News reported that the Trump administration had deported fewer people in February than the Biden administration had during the same month a year ago, according to data obtained by NBC News.

    Since being appointed as White House border czar, Tom Homan has sought cooperation from local and state governments to assist ICE in immigration-related arrests. On Wednesday, Homan visited lawmakers in Albany, New York, and slammed so-called sanctuary jurisdictions that limit cooperation with ICE.

    “So sanctuary cities are going to get exactly what they don’t want, more agents in the community and more collateral arrests, because you have forced us in the community, because you have failed to let us in the jail,” Homan said.

    Didi Martinez

    Didi Martinez is a producer with the NBC News Investigative Unit. 

  • Starmer says ‘all options on table’ as Trump tariffs kick in – BBC.com

    Starmer says ‘all options on table’ as Trump tariffs kick in – BBC.com

    João da Silva and Tom Espiner

    Business reporters, BBC News

    Getty Images Steel workers operate machineryGetty Images

    Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has said the UK will “keep all options on the table” as US President Donald Trump’s tariffs on imports of steel and aluminium take effect.

    The UK exports hundreds of millions of pounds worth of steel to the US every year, which will be subject to the 25% levy.

    The EU, facing the same tariffs, said on Wednesday it would impose counter-tariffs on €26bn (£22bn) of US goods, and Canada also responded with countermeasures, in an escalation of the wider trade war.

    Sir Keir said the UK was taking a “pragmatic” approach and was pushing for a trade deal, but opposition politicians called for a more “robust” response.

    When Sir Keir visited the White House last month, trade was high on the agenda, with the PM seeking a trade deal and exemptions to Trump’s tariffs.

    Asked at the time if the prime minister had convinced him not to impose trade tariffs on the UK, Trump said “he tried”, adding: “He was working hard, I’ll tell you that. He earned whatever the hell they pay him over there.”

    It is understood tariffs were also discussed during a phone call between Sir Keir and Trump on Monday.

    However, as the latest tariffs came into effect, there were no exemptions for any country.

    European Union (EU) President Ursula von der Leyen said the EU’s retaliatory tariffs were “strong but proportionate” and that the EU remains “open to negotiations”.

    The EU tariffs will be imposed on “products ranging from boats to bourbon to motorbikes,” the EU said. They will be partially introduced on 1 April and fully in place on 13 April.

    ‘Whatever they charge us, we’re charging them’

    Canada will impose C$29.8bn (£16bn) of retaliatory tariffs on US exports from Thursday, Canada’s Finance Minister Dominic LeBlanc said.

    Alongside steel and aluminium, the levies will apply to computers, sports equipment, and cast iron products, LeBlanc said.

    Later on Wednesday Trump said he would “of course” respond to the retaliation, repeating his warning that he planned to impose “reciprocal” tariffs on countries around the world.

    “Whatever it is, doesn’t matter what it is, if they charge us, if they charge us 25% or 20% or 10% or 2% or 200% then that’s what we’re charging them,” he said.

    The US President said he was “not happy” with EU trade policies, citing concerns about legal penalties it has imposed on Apple and rules he claimed put US farm products and cars at a disadvantage.

    “They’re doing what they should be doing perhaps for the European Union but it does create ill will,” he said.

    Repeating his threat to hit European cars with tariffs, he added later: “We’re going to win that financial battle.”

    British metals

    Tariffs could lead to US companies buying less from overseas. A knock-on effect could be more cheap steel flooding other markets, including the UK, as trade is redirected, putting additional pressure on domestic producers.

    Gareth Stace, director general at industry body UK Steel, said the US move was “hugely disappointing”.

    Some steel company contracts have already been cancelled or been put on hold, he said.

    Unite general secretary Sharon Graham called on the government to “act decisively” to protect the steel industry.

    The Community union called for a UK tax on carbon-intensive steel, produced with a bigger environmental footprint, which would include exports from China and India.

    The UK exports a relatively small amount of steel and aluminium to the US, around £700m in total. However the tariffs also cover products made with steel and aluminium, worth much more, about £2.2bn, or about 5% of UK exports to the US last year.

    Graphic showing how US tariffs could push UK prices down for consumers, but be bad for UK goods producers

    Sir Keir’s comments at Prime Minister’s Questions came in response to Lib Dem leader Sir Ed Davey, who called for the UK to be “more robust” with the US president “like the Europeans and like the Canadians”.

    Conservative shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said Labour “can’t even get themselves in the room” to negotiate with the US”.

    Sir Keir said: “We are… negotiating an economic deal which covers and will include tariffs if we succeed, but we will keep all options on the table.”

    There have been frequent talks between ministers and US officials since the measures were first proposed in February, the BBC understands.

    The UK hasn’t ruled out retaliation in the long term, but that seems unlikely for now.

    Trump hopes the tariffs will boost US steel and aluminium production in the longer run, but critics say in the immediate term they will raise prices for US consumers and dent economic growth.

    The EU estimated that the latest measures affect about 5% of its total exports to the US, while the US is the destination for roughly 90% of Canada’s steel and aluminium exports.

    US share prices sank on Monday and Tuesday as traders and analysts expressed recession fears.

    The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) lobby group said the tariffs would boost US steel manufacturing, create jobs, and close a system of exemptions, exclusions and quotas that allowed foreign producers to avoid tariffs.

    Price rise fears

    Others in the US do not support the tariffs.

    Michael DiMarino runs Linda Tool, a Brooklyn company that makes parts for the aerospace industry, said he was concerned prices for steel would rise.

    “If I have higher prices, I pass them on to my customers. They have higher prices, they pass it on to the consumer,” Mr DiMarino said. “Does the consumer have the money to pay those higher prices, or do they reduce their demand?”

    The American Automotive Policy Council, a group that represents car giants such Ford, General Motors and Stellantis, said they were concerned tariffs on Canada and Mexico would add “significant costs” for car makers’ suppliers.

    In 2018, during his first term as president, Trump imposed similar tariffs on metal imports, but carve-outs were eventually negotiated for many countries.

    On Tuesday, Trump rescinded his threat to double the tariffs on Canada specifically after Ontario agreed to suspend the surcharge it had placed on electricity.

    Additional reporting by Michelle Fleury in New York, plus Ben King and Henry Zeffman in London.

    Thin red banner with an image of the Houses of Parliament. It says:

    Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It’ll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

  • At Columbia, Tension Over Gaza Protests Hits Breaking Point Under Trump – The New York Times

    At Columbia, Tension Over Gaza Protests Hits Breaking Point Under Trump – The New York Times

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.

    There were protests, arrests, the departure of the school’s president. Then, a new administration arrived in Washington.

    Protesters and helmeted officers outside the gates to Columbia University.
    Demonstrations against the war in Gaza engulfed the Columbia University campus and neighboring streets last spring.Credit…Karsten Moran for The New York Times

    Days after immigration officers arrested a prominent pro-Palestinian campus activist, administrators at Columbia University gathered students and faculty from the journalism school and issued a warning.

    Students who were not U.S. citizens should avoid publishing work on Gaza, Ukraine and protests related to their former classmate’s arrest, urged Stuart Karle, a First Amendment lawyer and adjunct professor. With about two months to go before graduation, their academic accomplishments — or even their freedom — could be at risk if they attracted the ire of the Trump administration.

    “If you have a social media page, make sure it is not filled with commentary on the Middle East,” he told the gathering in Pulitzer Hall. When a Palestinian student objected, the journalism school’s dean, Jelani Cobb, was more direct about the school’s inability to defend international students from federal prosecution.

    “Nobody can protect you,” Mr. Cobb said. “These are dangerous times.”

    For the past two academic years, student protests against the war in Gaza have forced Columbia into a high-stakes balancing act between the competing demands of free speech and student safety.

    Last week, the school was pushed from its high wire.

    First, the Trump administration revoked $400 million in federal grants and contracts over what it said was the school’s failure to combat antisemitism, an extraordinary step that Columbia’s interim president said would affect “nearly every corner of the university.”

    The next day, immigration agents arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a recent graduate, and removed him from university housing. President Trump said he would be stripped of his green card and deported.


    Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and log into your Times account, or subscribe for all of The Times.


    Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

    Already a subscriber? Log in.

    Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

  • Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect – The Associated Press

    Trump vows to take back ‘stolen’ wealth as tariffs on steel and aluminum imports go into effect – The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump openly challenged U.S. allies on Wednesday by increasing tariffs on all steel and aluminum imports to 25% as he vowed to take back wealth “stolen” by other countries, drawing quick retaliation from Europe and Canada.

    The Republican president’s use of tariffs to extract concessions from other nations points toward a possibly destructive trade war and a stark change in America’s approach to global leadership. It also has destabilized the stock market and stoked anxiety about an economic downturn.

    “The United States of America is going to take back a lot of what was stolen from it by other countries and, frankly, by incompetent U.S. leadership,” Trump told reporters on Wednesday. “We’re going to take back our wealth, and we’re going to take back a lot of the companies that left.”

    Trump removed all exemptions from his 2018 tariffs on the metals, in addition to increasing the tariffs on aluminum from 10%. His moves, based off a February directive, are part of a broader effort to disrupt and transform global commerce.

    He has separate tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China, with plans to also tax imports from the European Union, Brazil and South Korea by charging “reciprocal” rates starting on April 2.

    The EU announced its own countermeasures on Wednesday. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that as the United States was “applying tariffs worth 28 billion dollars, we are responding with countermeasures worth 26 billion euros,” or about $28 billion. Those measures, which cover not just steel and aluminum products but also textiles, home appliances and agricultural goods, are due to take effect on April 1.

    U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer responded by saying that the EU was punishing America instead of fixing what he viewed as excess capacity in steel and aluminum production.

    “The EU’s punitive action completely disregards the national security imperatives of the United States – and indeed international security – and is yet another indicator that the EU’s trade and economic policies are out of step with reality,” he said in a statement.

    Meeting on Wednesday with Ireland’s Taoiseach Micheál Martin, Trump said “of course” he wants to respond to EU’s retaliations and “of course” Ireland is taking advantage of the United States.

    “The EU was set up in order to take advantage of the United States,” Trump said.

    Last year, the United States ran a $87 billion trade imbalance with Ireland. That’s partially because of the tax structure created by Trump’s 2017 overhaul, which incentivized U.S. pharmaceutical companies to record their sales abroad, Brad Setser, a senior fellow at the Council of Foreign Relations, said on X.

    Canada sees itself as locked in a trade war because of White House claims about fentanyl smuggling and that its natural resources and factories subtract from the U.S. economy instead of supporting it.

    “This is going to be a day to day fight. This is now the second round of unjustified tariffs leveled against Canada,” said Mélanie Joly, Canada’s foreign affairs minister. “The latest excuse is national security despite the fact that Canada’s steel and aluminum adds to America’s security. All the while there is a threat of further and broader tariffs on April 2 still looming. The excuse for those tariffs shifts every day.”

    Canada is the largest foreign supplier of steel and aluminum to the United States and plans to impose retaliatory tariffs of Canadian $29.8 billion ($20.7 billion) starting Thursday in response to the U.S. taxes on the metals.

    Canada’s new tariffs would be on steel and aluminum products, as well as U.S. goods including computers, sports equipment and water heaters worth $14.2 billion Canadian ($9.9 billion). That’s in addition to the 25% counter tariffs on $30 billion Canadian (US$20.8 billion) of imports from the U.S. that were put in place on March 4 in response to other Trump import taxes that he’s partially delayed by a month.

    Trump told CEOs in the Business Roundtable a day earlier that the tariffs were causing companies to invest in U.S. factories. The 7.5% drop in the S&P 500 stock index over the past month on fears of deteriorating growth appears unlikely to dissuade him, as Trump argued that higher tariff rates would be more effective at bringing back factories.

    “The higher it goes, the more likely it is they’re going to build,” Trump told the group. “The biggest win is if they move into our country and produce jobs. That’s a bigger win than the tariffs themselves, but the tariffs are going to be throwing off a lot of money to this country.”

    Trump on Tuesday had threatened to put tariffs of 50% on steel and aluminum from Canada, but he chose to stay with the 25% rate after the province of Ontario suspended plans to put a surcharge on electricity sold to Michigan, Minnesota and New York.

    Democratic lawmakers dismissed Trump’s claims that his tariffs are about national security and drug smuggling, saying they’re actually about generating revenues to help cover the cost of his planned income tax cuts for the wealthy.

    “Donald Trump knows his policies could wreck the economy, but he’s doing it anyway,” said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York. “Why are they doing all these crazy things that Americans don’t like? One reason, and one reason alone: tax breaks for billionaires, the north star of the Republican party’s goals.

    In many ways, the president is addressing what he perceives as unfinished business from his first term. Trump meaningfully increased tariffs, but the revenues collected by the federal government were too small to significantly increase overall inflationary pressures.

    Outside forecasts by the Budget Lab at Yale University, Tax Policy Center and others suggest that U.S. families would have the costs of the taxes passed onto them in the form of higher prices.

    With Wednesday’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, Trump is seeking to remedy his original 2018 import taxes that were eroded by exemptions.

    After Canada and Mexico agreed to his demand for a revamped North American trade deal in 2020, they avoided the import taxes on the metals. Other U.S. trading partners had import quotas supplant the tariffs. And the first Trump administration also allowed U.S. companies to request exemptions from the tariffs if, for instance, they couldn’t find the steel they needed from domestic producers.

    While Trump’s tariffs could help steel and aluminum plants in the United States, they could raise prices for the manufacturers that use the metals as raw materials.

    Moreover, economists have found, the gains to the steel and aluminum industries were more than offset by the cost they imposed on “downstream’’ manufacturers that use their products.

    At these downstream companies, production fell by nearly $3.5 billion because of the tariffs in 2021, a loss that exceeded the $2.3 billion uptick in production that year by aluminum producers and steelmakers, the U.S. International Trade Commission found in 2023.

    Trump sees the tariffs as leading to more domestic factories, and the White House has noted that Volvo, Volkswagen and Honda are all exploring an increase to their U.S. footprint. But the prospect of higher prices, fewer sales and lower profits might cause some companies to refrain from investing in new facilities.

    “If you’re an executive in the boardroom, are you really going to tell your board it’s the time to expand that assembly line?” said John Murphy, senior vice president at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

    The top steel exporters to the U.S. are Canada, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea and Japan, with exports from Taiwan and Vietnam growing at a fast pace, according to the International Trade Administration. Imports from China, the world’s largest steel producer, account for only a small fraction of what the U.S. buys.

    The lion’s share of U.S. aluminum imports comes from Canada.

  • Trump administration cuts ties, ends suit against company alleging abuse at child migrant shelters – The Associated Press

    Trump administration cuts ties, ends suit against company alleging abuse at child migrant shelters – The Associated Press

    By  VALERIE GONZALEZ

     

    McALLEN, Texas (AP) — The Trump administration moved to drop a civil lawsuit Wednesday against the largest provider of housing for migrant children over allegations of sexual abuse and harassment of unaccompanied minors, saying it also would no longer be using that company’s services.

    The motion to dismiss the suit against Southwest Key Programs was filed after the federal government announced it had moved all unaccompanied children to other shelters and would no longer be using that provider.

    The complaint, filed last year during the Biden administration, alleged a litany of offenses between 2015 and 2023 as Southwest Key Programs, which operates migrant shelters in Texas, Arizona and California, amassed nearly $3 billion in contracts from the Department of Health and Human Services.

    “Out of continuing concerns relating to these placements, HHS has decided to stop placement of unaccompanied alien children in Southwest Key facilities, and to review its grants with the organization. In view of HHS’ action, the Department of Justice has dismissed its lawsuit against Southwest Key,” the HHS said in a statement.

    Southwest Key Programs furloughed employees across the country. “Due to the unforeseen federal funding freeze and the stop placement order on our unaccompanied minor shelters and Home Study Post Release programs by the Office of Refugee Resettlement, we have made the difficult decision to furlough approximately 5,000 Southwest Key Programs’ employees,” the company said in a statement shared Tuesday.

    According to allegations in the 2024 lawsuit, Southwest Key employees, including supervisors, raped, inappropriately touched or solicited sex and nude images of children beginning in 2015 and possibly earlier.

    Among the accusations: One employee “repeatedly sexually abused” three girls ages 5, 8 and 11 at the Casa Franklin shelter in El Paso, Texas, with the 8-year-old telling investigators the worker “entered their bedrooms in the middle of the night to touch their ‘private area.’”

    The lawsuit also alleged that another employee, at a shelter in Mesa, Arizona, took a 15-year-old boy to a hotel and paid him to perform sexual acts for several days in 2020.

    Children were warned not to report the alleged abuse and threatened with violence against themselves or their families if they did, according to the lawsuit. Victims testified that in some instances, other workers knew about the abuse but failed to report or concealed it, the complaint said.

    “DOJ’s lawsuit revealed horrific sexual abuse and inhumane treatment of children detained in Southwest Key shelters,” said Leecia Welch, an attorney who represents unaccompanied children in a separate case. “It’s shocking to me that the government now turns a blind eye to their own contractor’s actions. I hope the impacted children will have other legal recourse and support in healing from their abuse.”

    At least two employees have been indicted on criminal charges related to the allegations since 2020.

    The civil lawsuit had sought a jury trial and monetary damages for the victims.

  • Trump Live Updates: Supreme Court Rejects Foreign Aid Freeze and Latest Tariff News – The New York Times

    Trump Live Updates: Supreme Court Rejects Foreign Aid Freeze and Latest Tariff News – The New York Times

    John Ismay

    Hegseth’s personal lawyer to be commissioned as a Navy commander in the reserves.

    Image

    Timothy C. Parlatore appearing on “Meet the Press” in Washington in 2023.Credit…William B. Plowman/NBC, via Getty Images

    In a Pentagon ceremony on Friday morning, Timothy C. Parlatore, a former naval officer who has been Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s personal lawyer for the past eight years, will be directly commissioned as a Navy commander in the Judge Advocate General’s Corps as a reservist.

    Mr. Parlatore confirmed his plans in an interview on Wednesday evening, and said he will be assigned to a reserve unit that works for the secretary of defense’s office.

    During his periods of reserve duty in uniform, Mr. Parlatore intends to focus on improving how the military’s uniformed lawyers are trained. When he returns to civilian life between his reserve obligations, he will continue to run his private practice.

    In 2019, Mr. Parlatore successfully defended Eddie Gallagher, a SEAL accused of first-degree murder in the death of a captive ISIS fighter as well as the attempted murder of civilians in Iraq. That case brought Mr. Parlatore to President Trump’s attention, and he has appeared frequently on Fox News to discuss his defense of military clients.

    A 2002 U.S. Naval Academy graduate, Mr. Parlatore served aboard the cruiser U.S.S. Normandy in Norfolk, Va., before taking an early release from active duty in 2005 to attend law school. While building his legal practice, he served as the officer in charge of a security detachment in the Bronx as lieutenant in the reserves, and was honorably discharged in 2013.

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    Zach Montague

    Appeals court rules Trump can remove federal ethics watchdog.

    Image

    Credit…Tierney L. Cross for The New York Times

    A federal appeals court cleared the way on Wednesday for the Trump administration to remove Hampton Dellinger, the head of the Office of Special Counsel, from his position, lifting a lower court’s order that had allowed the federal watchdog lawyer to remain.

    In a brief order on Wednesday evening, a three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that the government had succeeded in arguing that an order keeping Mr. Dellinger in place should be lifted.

    The ruling effectively dealt the Trump administration the upper hand in the struggle over Mr. Dellinger’s fate. The Supreme Court could weigh in on whether Mr. Dellinger and other officials who play a similar role in the executive branch are subject to removal and replacement by the president.

    Lower courts had previously sided with Mr. Dellinger and Cathy Harris, a government lawyer on the Merit Systems Protection Board, an independent agency that reviews actions by the Office of Personnel Management. Both lawyers received letters last month notifying them that they had been fired.

    The Supreme Court appeared to be poised to step in on at least one of those cases to issue the final word on whether those positions, which were created by Congress and designed to have certain independence, could be shielded from efforts to control them.

    The appeals court decision also came as Mr. Dellinger and Ms. Harris had recently intervened on behalf of federal workers challenging their termination as the Trump administration shrinks the federal work force. Earlier on Wednesday, Mr. Dellinger issued a statement urging all agencies to rescind any “unlawful terminations” of probationary workers. Last week, a federal judge ruled that guidance sent by the Office of Personnel Management directing those firings was unlawful.

    Michelle Bercovici, a lawyer who represents federal employees in litigation before the Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel, said in an email that efforts to remove Mr. Dellinger had potential to jeopardize his agency’s advocacy on behalf of federal workers.

    “The idea that the independent, primary watchdog of the civil service can be replaced by political whim is deeply unsettling and his termination is a true threat to the integrity of the government,” she said.

    Cecilia Kang

    A federal grant program opens the door to Elon Musk’s Starlink.

    Image

    Elon Musk at President Trump’s address to Congress on Tuesday. Mr. Musk’s Starlink satellite internet service could benefit from a rules change in the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment Program.Credit…Kenny Holston/The New York Times

    The Trump administration said on Wednesday that it would overhaul a $42 billion federal grant program aimed at expanding high-speed internet to the nation, including easing some rules that could benefit Elon Musk’s satellite internet service, Starlink.

    The program will be revamped to “take a tech-neutral approach” in its distribution of funds to states, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a statement. The program’s rules, which were created during the Biden administration, previously favored broadband lines made of fiber-optic cables attached to homes.

    “The department is ripping out the Biden administration’s pointless requirements,” Mr. Lutnick said. The Commerce Department will also remove regulatory and other barriers that slow down construction and connection to households, he added.

    Congress created the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment Program in 2021 to extend broadband to the most remote areas of the nation. The Commerce Department came up with standards and rules for states and territories applying for the funds — including the preference for fiber-optic broadband, which provides the fastest internet service speeds.

    Mr. Musk, who is a close adviser to President Trump and helping to lead a government efficiency initiative, is chief executive of SpaceX, the rocket company that makes Starlink. Starlink uses low-altitude satellites to beam internet service to dishes anywhere on the planet and then to devices. It serves nearly five million subscribers worldwide and was used by emergency responders late last year in North Carolina when communications networks shut down after a hurricane.

    The Commerce Department’s internet program has not yet disbursed any funds, and Republicans have used it as an example of a program that was slowed down by red tape.

    Some have accused the Biden administration of unfairly blocking Starlink from the grants and say the satellite service can immediately serve some of the most remote areas of the nation.

    In 2023, the Federal Communications Commission rejected Starlink’s application for almost $900 million in subsidies in a separate rural broadband program, saying the company failed to show it could meet service requirements for the funding.

    Brendan Carr, then a Republican F.C.C. commissioner and now chairman of the agency, opposed that decision and said the action had put the F.C.C. on a “growing list of administrative agencies that are taking action against Elon Musk’s businesses.”

    Mr. Musk’s business interests — which also include the electric-car maker Tesla and the social media company X — have prompted concerns about potential conflicts of interest as he makes important decisions in Washington.

    On Wednesday, some public interest groups expressed concern that Mr. Lutnick’s plans to change the broadband program could directly benefit Mr. Musk.

    “Fiber broadband is widely understood to be better than other internet options — like Starlink’s satellites — because it delivers significantly faster speeds,” said Drew Garner, a director of policy engagement for the nonprofit Benton Institute for Broadband & Society.

    The Commerce Department did not immediately respond to requests for details on the plan. Mr. Musk did not respond to a request for comment.

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    Zach Montague

    A three-judge panel from the District of Columbia Court of Appeals lifted an injunction on Wednesday evening that had allowed Hampton Dellinger, the head of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, to keep his job after attempts by the Trump administration to remove him. A lower court had found that Mr. Dellinger’s role should be insulated from political efforts to replace him. He will likely appeal to the Supreme Court.

    Maya C. Miller

    The House speaker’s top aide was arrested for alleged drunken driving after Trump’s speech.

    Image

    Speaker Mike Johnson’s office confirmed on Wednesday that Hayden Haynes, Mr. Johnson’s chief of staff, was involved in an “encounter” with Capitol Police on Tuesday night.Credit…Kenny Holston/The New York Times

    The U.S. Capitol Police said the chief of staff to Speaker Mike Johnson was arrested for drunken driving on Tuesday night after the top aide backed his car into a parked Capitol Police vehicle.

    The arrest came soon after President Trump, with Mr. Johnson presiding behind him, finished delivering his first address to a joint session of Congress since returning to office.

    “A driver backed into a parked vehicle last night around 11:40 p.m.,” a Capitol Police spokesman said in a statement. “We responded and arrested them for D.U.I.”

    Mr. Johnson’s office confirmed on Wednesday that Hayden Haynes, the speaker’s chief of staff, was involved in an “encounter” with Capitol Police on Tuesday night, releasing a statement that indicated that he would continue to hold his powerful post.

    “The speaker has known and worked closely with Hayden for nearly a decade and trusted him to serve as his chief of staff for his entire tenure in Congress,” Taylor Haulsee, Mr. Johnson’s spokesman, said in a statement about the arrest, which was reported earlier by NBC News. “Because of this and Hayden’s esteemed reputation among members and staff alike, the speaker has full faith and confidence in Hayden’s ability to lead the speaker’s office.”

    Mr. Haynes was released with a citation, rather than taken to jail, and would have a court date “within the coming weeks,” according to the Capitol Police. Since drunken driving cases in Washington, D.C., are prosecuted by the district’s attorney general rather than the U.S. district attorney’s office under the Justice Department, the Trump administration would have no apparent role in the case.

    Edward WongMattathias Schwartz

    National Endowment for Democracy sues top Trump aides over funding freeze.

    Image

    Peter Roskam in 2017. A former Republican congressman, Mr. Roskam, now the chairman of the National Endowment for Democracy, said the organization filed a lawsuit on Wednesday because it had been unable to get the State Department to restart the flow of money.Credit…Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call, via Getty Images

    The National Endowment for Democracy, a nonprofit that has had bipartisan support over decades for its work promoting democracy abroad, is suing the U.S. government and cabinet officials for withholding $239 million in congressional appropriations.

    Members of the group’s board, which includes current and former Republican and Democratic lawmakers, said the organization filed the lawsuit on Wednesday afternoon as a last resort because it had been unable to get the State Department to restart the flow of money.

    The group is also asking a court to prevent the government from withholding any future funds appropriated by Congress.

    The group has had to put about 75 percent of its staff on unpaid leave, and about 1,200 grant recipients have received no money for projects since late January, after President Trump signed an executive order freezing all foreign aid.

    In the lawsuit, filed in Federal District Court for the District of Columbia, the group argues that its money from Congress is not foreign aid and does not fall under the purview of the State Department, which manages the transfer of funds, or any other executive branch agency. Withholding the funding, the board members say, is illegal.

    Peter Roskam, a former Republican congressman from Illinois who chairs the nonprofit, said the board voted on Tuesday to go to court.

    “We’d be delighted to learn that this was just an oversight and someone just forgot to hit the send button,” he said in an interview on Wednesday, minutes before the lawsuit was filed. “But clearly that’s not what’s going on.”

    The endowment’s plight is emblematic of the colossal shift in foreign policy that is taking place in the second Trump administration, as the president tries to move the government away from work aimed at strengthening values-based alliances, democracy and human rights toward a more nakedly transactional and nationalistic approach.

    Mr. Trump tried to overturn the results of the 2020 election that he lost to Joseph R. Biden Jr., and the House of Representatives voted to impeach him for a second time because of his incitement of a riot at the Capitol against lawmakers certifying Mr. Biden’s win.

    Some senior administration officials have adopted language, including phrases once common among progressive critics of the U.S. government, about the downside of American projects that seek to extend influence across societies abroad, calling such programs “nation-building” and attempts at “regime change.”

    Representatives for the White House, the State Department and the Justice Department did not respond to requests for comment.

    Elon Musk, the billionaire adviser to Mr. Trump, posted scathing criticism of the National Endowment for Democracy online last month, saying without providing evidence that it was “RIFE with CORRUPTION!!” “That evil organization needs to be dissolved,” he wrote, using the same conspiratorial language he has employed to describe the U.S. Agency for International Development, which Mr. Musk has helped dismantle.

    Image

    Elon Musk criticized the National Endowment for Democracy as being “RIFE with CORRUPTION!!” in an online post last month.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times

    Representative Elise Stefanik, a New York Republican who is Mr. Trump’s pick for ambassador to the United Nations, was on the National Endowment for Democracy board until she had to step down to prepare for Senate confirmation for her new job. Senator Todd Young, Republican of Indiana, is currently on the board.

    Mr. Trump’s “America First” policy has also been brought into sharp relief in recent weeks by his criticism of democratic Ukraine in its defensive fight against Russia; his imposing of high tariffs on two allies, Canada and Mexico; his insistence on taking mineral-rich Greenland from Denmark, another ally; and his decision to cut off almost all U.S. foreign aid, which strategists have seen as an important component of American soft power.

    The grants the National Endowment for Democracy gives out are focused on promoting democracy, free speech and religious freedoms in more than 100 countries and territories, including ones that the first Trump administration and the Biden administration considered rivals or adversaries — China, Russia, Belarus, Iran, North Korea, Venezuela and Cuba.

    The grants fund projects such as the development of software that allows citizens to view banned websites and efforts to support independent journalism.

    One recipient, China Labor Watch, a New York-based group with overseas offices, monitors the coerced labor and trafficking of Chinese workers. Its founder, Li Qiang, said in an interview that he had not received $150,000 of National Endowment for Democracy funds he had been expecting this year, and that most funding directly from the State Department was still frozen. He has had to lay off workers or put them on unpaid leave.

    Mel Martinez, a former Republican senator representing Florida, said the Trump administration’s unwillingness to release funding for organizations that support overseas dissidents was an affront to exiles from Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. “That entire group of people are politically active,” he said. “Many have been strong supporters of the president.”

    In Venezuela, National Endowment for Democracy grants support independent groups that monitor elections and help provide legal defense to dissidents targeted by the autocratic government.

    Authoritarian governments, including those of China and Russia, have denounced the work of the endowment over many years.

    The lawsuit noted that the sudden halt in funding further endangers grant recipients living under a hostile government: “The freezing of the endowment’s funds poses special risk to partners operating in highly authoritarian contexts, as the sudden interruption in support may expose their operations and staff as endowment grantees.”

    The group traces its origins to a speech by President Ronald Reagan to the British Parliament in 1982. He vowed that “the march of freedom and democracy” would “leave Marxism-Leninism on the ash-heap of history.” Congress passed a law establishing the National Endowment for Democracy the following year.

    The endowment gives funding to several sister nonprofits, notably the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute. Those groups are also ending programs because of the funding freeze. Several Senate allies of Mr. Trump, including Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, sit on the International Republican Institute board.

    Secretary of State Marco Rubio, a defendant in the lawsuit, is a former board member.

    The Republican group’s website says it has had to disable its operations to save on expenses, but a page aims to remind people of the work that it does: “Dictators are afraid of their own people. Helping citizens have a voice in their country is at the heart of what I.R.I. does.”

    Last November, a post on the group’s X social media account, which is now defunct, congratulated Mr. Rubio on being picked to be Mr. Trump’s secretary of state and called him a “leading champion of freedom.”

    David Super, a professor who studies administrative law at Georgetown University, said the National Endowment for Democracy’s case had some similarities to a lawsuit filed by contracting companies for U.S.A.I.D. The Trump administration also froze that agency’s funds. In both cases, Mr. Super said, Congress had passed “clear, mandatory authorizing and appropriations statutes.” Withholding money from the endowment, he said, “is clearly violating both laws.”

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    Glenn ThrushAdam Goldman

    Attorney general’s brother seeks to lead D.C. bar association.

    Image

    Attorney General Pam Bondi’s brother Bradley is a partner at a global white-collar criminal defense firm with offices in Washington.Credit…Kenny Holston/The New York Times

    Bradley J. Bondi, brother of Attorney General Pam Bondi, has announced his candidacy to lead the bar association in Washington at a time when the group might be asked to consider accusations that political appointees at the Justice Department violated professional or ethical norms.

    Mr. Bondi, a partner at Paul Hastings, a global white-collar criminal defense firm with offices in Washington, threw his hat in the ring in late February, according to a roster of candidates posted on the association’s website.

    The three-year position of president at the 118,000-member association is unpaid. The role does not extend to controlling disbarments and other disciplinary actions, which are handled by a board of professional responsibility that is appointed and overseen by a court, according to the association’s bylaws.

    But his candidacy comes at a time when Ms. Bondi, like many other Trump appointees, is quashing internal dissent and seeking retribution against President Trump’s perceived enemies in ways that have challenged norms of prosecutorial independence from politics.

    The association, which acted to disbar former Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York for promoting lies about the 2020 election, could soon become a venue to resolve complaints about the conduct of other Trump allies. Former prosecutors and Democrats are considering filing complaints against department officials over what they claim are efforts to inject politics into prosecutorial decision making, particularly at the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington.

    The bar association’s election period starts next month and ends in early June. Mr. Bondi’s opponent is Diane A. Seltzer, a Maryland-based lawyer who runs a small firm specializing in employment law. She has been far more active in the bar association than Mr. Bondi.

    Mr. Bondi, 51, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    Mr. Bondi, a former top staff member at the Securities and Exchange Commission, was already a well-known and deeply connected defense lawyer in Washington before his sister became attorney general. But his professional life has, in recent years, intersected with people in her orbit — including Mr. Trump’s business associates and Elon Musk.

    He represented Tesla Inc. in a 2018 settlement with the S.E.C. over Mr. Musk’s social media posts about taking the company private. Six years later, Trump transition officials considered Mr. Bondi as a candidate to run the commission, but opted for Paul Atkins, whom Mr. Bondi has described as a close friend.

    Last year, Mr. Bondi’s practice group at Paul Hastings was hired to represent Miami-based Digital World Acquisition Corp., in its merger negotiations with Mr. Trump’s media company.

    Ms. Bondi later reported owning nearly $3 million in Trump Media shares after the parent company of Truth Social went public a year ago, according to financial disclosures.

    In January, a group of investors seeking to buy TikTok enlisted Mr. Bondi to prepare a bid. Mr. Trump later reversed President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s ban on the Chinese social media app.

    Shortly before Mr. Trump’s inauguration, Mr. Bondi signed on to represent Carolina Amesty, a former Republican state legislator in Florida charged by federal prosecutors with stealing $122,000 in pandemic relief aid, according to court filings.

    Mr. Bondi has given more than $25,000 to political committees in support of Mr. Trump since 2020, according to federal campaign finance records. But he does not seem to share Mr. Trump’s determination to roll back diversity and inclusion efforts, a cause enthusiastically championed by his sister.

    In 2021, Mr. Bondi set aside $100,000 to create the “Bradley J. Bondi Diversity and Inclusion Endowed Scholarship” at the University of Florida College of Law, his alma mater.

    Kitty Bennett contributed research, and Charlie Savage contributed reporting.

    Carl Hulse

    Congressional memo

    With Musk targeting Social Security, Democrats see a political opportunity.

    Image

    Democrats, like Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, second from left, have pounced on Elon Musk for deriding the nation’s most popular federal program as a pyramid scheme.Credit…Julia Demaree Nikhinson/Associated Press

    After the 2004 elections, a Republican president, newly returned to office, decided the political moment was right to overhaul Social Security, making it more like private retirement plans in a bid to prevent it from going bankrupt in the future. Two years and a bruising political fight later, Democrats took back the House and Senate from Republicans.

    Democrats now believe history may be about to repeat itself.

    Elon Musk, the multibillionaire overseeing the Trump administration effort to drastically shrink government, has derided the nation’s most popular federal program as a sketchy pyramid scheme while pushing to close offices and eliminate thousands of jobs of those who administer the program. In doing so, he has touched a topic that has traditionally been known as the third rail of American politics. And Democrats, who increasingly regard Mr. Musk as a more opportune political target than even President Trump himself, have rushed to highlight what they consider to be a major political blunder.

    “They don’t learn,” Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the Democratic leader, said of Republicans as his party pounced on the issue. “Their biggest mistake was going after Social Security when George Bush was president. And now they are doing it again.”

    Illustrating the emphasis Democrats intend to put on the subject, Senator Elissa Slotkin, the Michigan Democrat who delivered her party’s rebuttal to Mr. Trump’s congressional address on Tuesday night, hit on Social Security as well, using it to cast doubt on the president’s vows not to touch the federal retirement program.

    “The president claims he won’t, but Elon Musk just called Social Security the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time,” she said in her remarks, quoting a social media post by Mr. Musk.

    Image

    Senator Elissa Slotkin rehearsing the Democratic rebuttal to President Trump’s congressional address on Tuesday. In her speech, she quoted Mr. Musk as calling Social Security “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.”Credit…Pool photo by Paul Sancya

    Democrats were already pressing Republicans on potential cuts to Medicaid, the government health coverage program for lower-income Americans, but they view threats to Social Security as having broader resonance.

    Congressional Republicans respond that Democrats are distorting the Trump administration’s — and their — position on Social Security and that they are simply trying to bolster the finances of the program to guarantee that it won’t run out of money, allowing future generations, like past ones, to get the money they paid in.

    “We need to make sure that Social Security is strengthened and saved for the future so that everyone who’s paid in can get it,” said Senator John Barrasso of Wyoming, the No. 2 Senate Republican.

    Social Security has long been the political backbone of the Democratic Party. For years, Democrats have capitalized on the slightest hint of any attempt to dismantle or privatize it, as they did when President George W. Bush pushed the idea in 2005, much to the detriment of his party’s midterm election fortunes.

    The issue is so volatile that when Senator Rick Scott, Republican of Florida, put forward a policy agenda during the 2022 midterm elections that would have theoretically required the program to expire and be re-evaluated, he was immediately repudiated by Republican leaders and eventually had to disavow his own plan.

    Image

    Senator Rick Scott with Mr. Musk on Wednesday. Mr. Scott was repudiated by Republican leaders after putting forward a policy agenda during the 2022 midterms that would have theoretically required Social Security to expire and be re-evaluated.Credit…Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

    Mr. Trump has repeatedly emphasized that he has no plans to tinker with Social Security or Medicare. But Democrats see something afoot with Mr. Musk’s derogatory comments and Mr. Trump’s claims that the program is riddled with fraud.

    Despite multiple reviews that have found Social Security to be one of the better-run federal programs with a record of never missing payments, Mr. Musk has characterized the program as riddled with fraud and waste.

    Mr. Trump emphasized that theme in Tuesday night’s address, saying that millions of obviously long-dead beneficiaries remain on the Social Security rolls. But the claim he and Mr. Musk make that benefits still flow to those people has been widely debunked. The agency says that it is a data recording problem, and has reported that just under 90,000 people 99 years or older received Social Security benefits in December — slightly more than the 85,000 Americans over the age of 100 recorded by the Census Bureau.

    Still, Democrats see the focus by Mr. Musk and Mr. Trump on erroneous claims of fraud as laying the groundwork for a benefit review that could affect those lawfully receiving monthly benefits as Republicans search for ways to offset the cost of hugely expensive tax cuts.

    Democrats say an equal threat to the program are plans to reduce the work force that had already shrunk, including an effort to pare down as many as 7,000 employees while consolidating regional offices and ending the leases on dozens of field offices around the country. They say the loss of personnel and the shuttering of offices would be tantamount to denying benefits to applicants who would face long waits to talk to advisers or to receive their assistance.

    Senator Patty Murray, Democrat of Washington, said such delays would break the inherent promise of Social Security that Americans can collect what they contributed.

    “Part of that promise means being able to get on the phone with an actual human being without having to wait on hold for an hour or more, visit an in-office person to help you get your benefits without having to jump through hoops or drive hundreds of miles,” Ms. Murray said. “But Trump and Elon are decimating the Social Security Administration and without adequate staff at the agency, there will be people who cannot get their benefits period.”

    Some Republicans also expressed concern about how cuts could affect the level of service their constituents receive.

    “I do know that it is a whole lot easier to work your way through Social Security benefits if you’re doing it in person with somebody who is well trained in how the system works,” said Senator Mike Rounds, Republican of South Dakota. “Trying to do any of that stuff online is much more difficult.”

    But Mr. Rounds also credited Mr. Musk with bringing attention to the fiscal condition of Social Security, which is in such dire financial trouble that benefit cuts could come within a decade if nothing changes.

    “He’s at least ringing the alarm that the rest of us have tried to do,” said Mr. Rounds, who added that obvious fixes were available.

    Image

    Senator Mike Rounds, Republican of South Dakota, credited Mr. Musk with bringing attention to the fiscal condition of Social Security while expressing concern about the level of service that could result from the cuts.Credit…Eric Lee/The New York Times

    Multiple ideas are circulating to stabilize the program, such as lifting the current $176,100 cap on the amount of pay that is taxed for Social Security.

    “If Congress eliminated the payroll tax cap for individuals with annual income in the millions of dollars — an amount Elon Musk makes every two hours — and collected the money they are illegally evading in taxes, Social Security would be fully funded for decades,” said Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the senior Democrat on the Finance Committee.

    But no one on Capitol Hill is talking seriously about raising that cap any time soon. For now, the push by Mr. Musk to shrink the agency and the beneficiary rolls will guarantee that Social Security remains at the center of the clash over federal spending in the coming months and next year’s elections.

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    Devlin Barrett

    Todd Blanche, a Trump lawyer, is confirmed as the No. 2 Justice Dept. official.

    Image

    Todd Blanche at a Senate confirmation hearing in the Capitol last month.Credit…Pete Kiehart for The New York Times

    The Senate on Wednesday confirmed President Trump’s criminal defense attorney Todd Blanche to take the No. 2 position at the Justice Department, where he has vowed to end the kind of investigations and prosecutions that led to indictments against his client.

    Mr. Blanche’s nomination to be the deputy attorney general, with oversight of the F.B.I.; the Drug Enforcement Administration; the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives; and other federal law enforcement agencies, passed 52 to 46 in a mostly party-line vote.

    A former federal prosecutor in New York, Mr. Blanche was in private practice as a defense lawyer when he agreed to take on Mr. Trump as a client, assembling and managing a legal team to defend him against four separate indictments.

    He was Mr. Trump’s attorney in his New York State trial last year on charges of falsifying business records. Mr. Trump was convicted of all 34 counts, but he and his lawyers, including Mr. Blanche, have denounced the case as a misuse of prosecutorial power.

    Mr. Blanche carried that argument, and his anger, into his confirmation hearing last month. He told the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was still “frustrated” by what he called the unfair treatment of his client by judges and prosecutors. “That’s power, and that’s power that’s corrupted,” he said.

    Mr. Blanche is the most prominent of several lawyers who have represented Mr. Trump in private practice who are now poised to take senior positions within the Justice Department. Democrats have raised concerns that their elevation to those roles will create inherent ethical conflicts, but Mr. Blanche and the other Trump lawyers have downplayed such concerns.

    At his confirmation hearing, Mr. Blanche confirmed that his “attorney-client relationship with President Trump remains,” but added that he “will not violate my ethical obligations.”

    He also discounted any suggestion that he might be put in a difficult position by the president, who had a contentious relationship with Justice Department leaders during his first term.

    “I don’t think President Trump is going to ask me to do anything illegal or immoral,” Mr. Blanche said. “I say that with experience and firsthand knowledge.”

    Republican senators question Musk on DOGE cuts, gently insisting on input.

    Image

    Elon Musk leaving a Capitol Hill meeting with Republican senators on Wednesday.Credit…Haiyun Jiang for The New York Times

    Elon Musk arrived on Wednesday at Senate Republicans’ weekly luncheon on Capitol Hill ready to field questions about the work he is doing for President Trump at the Department of Government Efficiency, the office he formed that has taken a hatchet to the federal bureaucracy with no input from Congress.

    They had plenty.

    Republican senators have raised few public complaints about Mr. Musk as he has undertaken mass firings across the government without consulting or informing them. But during the nearly two-hour closed-door meeting, the senators gently questioned him about how they might share feedback, minimize blowback from their constituents and, perhaps, eventually get to vote on the cuts he is making.

    At one point during the largely friendly exchange, Mr. Musk, who made no presentation of his own, shared his personal phone number with senators and encouraged them to reach out directly with any concerns.

    “We’re getting feedback, and we want to respond to our constituents — how do we work most effectively to do that?” Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota said after the meeting, in characterizing the tenor of his colleagues’ questions.

    Other Republicans said they were simply trying to figure out how they could help Mr. Musk and Mr. Trump succeed.

    “There was just a general discussion about how we can make his cuts permanent,” said Senator John Kennedy of Louisiana. “There was general discussion about how we, as senators, can do a better job of explaining clearly what he’s doing.”

    The gathering highlighted the conundrum that DOGE’s slash-and-burn approach has created for a number of Republican lawmakers. Many of them genuinely believe the federal government and work force should be scaled back, and most are exceedingly reluctant to criticize Mr. Trump or Mr. Musk, who has a penchant for using his social media platform X to unleash a barrage of abuse against his critics, including Republican lawmakers.

    But they are also facing intense pushback from constituents at home affected by sprawling cuts and layoffs.

    In some cases, that has fueled an awkward two-step for Republicans, who have simultaneously praised the work DOGE is doing while also quietly seeking exemptions and special consideration for funding that helps their own constituents.

    “People were eager to have more feedback opportunities,” said Senator John Cornyn of Texas, who praised Mr. Musk’s efforts on the Senate floor ahead of the meeting.

    Mr. Musk took a largely deferential tone toward senators, according to lawmakers who attended. When one senator stood and asked whom to contact with questions about the group’s efforts, one of Mr. Musk’s senior advisers volunteered her contact information. Mr. Musk interjected and said senators could contact him directly, a person who witnessed the exchange said.

    While he told senators a major target was waste at the Pentagon — typically a place where Senate Republicans have refused to entertain spending cuts — he made a point of relaying an anecdote that Senator Susan Collins of Maine, the chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee, had shared with him. In recounting that story, which he has previously discussed, he said Ms. Collins gave the Navy money for more submarines, but no new submarines were produced.

    Senators said they were interested in trying to codify the cuts Mr. Musk’s group has already targeted — a move that would endorse DOGE’s actions while also reclaiming Congress’s power of the purse.

    Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky suggested that lawmakers ultimately should vote on the cuts DOGE has ordered using the recission process, which allows the president to ask Congress to cancel certain funds lawmakers have appropriated.

    Mr. Paul suggested that the Supreme Court ruling on Wednesday in which a majority of justices rejected Mr. Trump’s emergency request to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid indicated that using the recission process would be more fruitful than unilateral attempts by the executive branch to halt funding.

    “This is a bigger argument than just one person,” Mr. Paul said in an interview.

    He added: “Either the cuts and all the great things I think Elon is finding evaporate — they’re ephemeral — or we put them into a rescission package, they send them back to us, and we vote up or down on getting rid of them.”

    Mr. Musk appeared supportive of the idea, according to several senators who attended.

    “He said at one point, ‘You guys are going to have to act here to make any of this permanent,’” Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri said.

    Mr. Musk also briefed House Republicans at the Capitol later on Wednesday night, in another closed-door meeting that lasted roughly two hours. The message lawmakers sent him, according to Representative Ralph Norman of South Carolina: “Speed up, don’t slow down.”

    Advertisement

    SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

    June Kim

    Over the last three decades, since the North American free trade zone was created in 1994, automakers have built supply chains that cross borders. Cars assembled in the United States by American companies often have components that come from all over the world, and parts regularly cross the U.S. borders with Canada and Mexico. Read more about how global car production has become, making it hard to say what’s American-made.

    What’s an Import?

    National borders blur in vehicle production, with parts often sourced from around the world.

    Source: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

    The New York Times

    Karoun Demirjian

    The Supreme Court’s ruling is a victory for foreign aid groups, but its scale is unclear.

    Image

    Food provided by the U.S. Agency for International Development being distributed in South Sudan in 2023.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

    The Supreme Court’s Wednesday ruling that the Trump administration must heed a lower court’s order to release frozen foreign aid was a welcome but confusing development for humanitarian and development organizations around the world, as they waited to see if thousands of canceled contracts would be restarted.

    For weeks, the Trump administration has worked to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development, the federal agency chiefly responsible for disbursing foreign aid.

    Thousands of nongovernmental groups and companies that once partnered with it have been in limbo since the administration canceled over 90 percent of contracts, neutered the agency’s payments system and reneged on promises to pay for work already completed.

    The organizations that brought the lawsuit have insisted that the court’s ruling ought to force the Trump administration to restore all foreign aid funding. But the administration has been adamant that it was within its rights to decimate the agency.

    Here’s where things stand, and how this court order is expected to play out.

    President Trump has argued that some U.S.A.I.D. programs were counter to American interests, too “woke” and too expensive. On the first day of his second term, he signed an executive order to pause all foreign aid for 90 days, pending a review of programs to determine whether they aligned with his foreign policy objectives.

    The administration has stated in its court filings that the review was “largely completed,” after it announced its decision last week to terminate funding for about 5,800 contracts. Those contracts comprised over 90 percent of U.S.A.I.D.’s remaining caseload. On Wednesday, however, Pete Marocco, the State Department official who has been overseeing the cuts to the agency, told members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee that the review was in its early stages.

    The total funding allotted to U.S.A.I.D. programs before the cuts amounted to less than 1 percent of the overall federal budget.

    At this point, extremely little.

    Shortly after Mr. Trump issued his executive order, Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, allowed programs providing lifesaving humanitarian assistance to avoid the 90-day freeze and review.

    But in practice, almost all of the programs that had received waivers were unable to access funds to continue operating. Even a program to help contain an Ebola outbreak in Uganda was unable to access the money it needed.

    In recent days, a trickle of organizations received notice that their contract termination notices had been reversed. Among the revived contracts was one to procure H.I.V. medicines and manage supply chains to ship those drugs to countries with high rates of infection. A program to spray long-acting insecticide inside the homes of people in areas of Kenya and Uganda with some of the highest rates of malaria infection in the world was also permitted to resume, until April 30.

    But the changes in status have been scattered and erratic. According to Tom Hart, the head of InterAction, a U.S.-based alliance of international nongovernmental aid organizations, some groups whose contracts were canceled were notified that they had been reinstated and then canceled again.

    And nearly none of the reversals of terminations have come with restored funding, obliging partners to front the funds through corporate lines of credit and other sources, if they wish to resume their work.

    This is the million — or really, billion — dollar question.

    The Supreme Court’s one-paragraph order kicked the matter of determining how much foreign aid had to be restored back to Judge Amir H. Ali of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It was his order to release the funding that the Trump administration had appealed to the Supreme Court. The administration’s broad cancellation of contracts happened after Judge Ali’s order — and it is not clear if the Supreme Court’s ruling could force the administration to restore all the contracts it canceled.

    Democrats on Capitol Hill, who see the cuts to U.S.A.I.D. as flouting the will of Congress, which created the agency, insist that the ruling is absolute.

    “They’re defying the constitutional rules of Congress. Are they also going to defy the constitutional obligations by the Supreme Court?” asked Representative Julie Elizabeth Johnson, Democrat of Texas, after members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee met with Mr. Marocco on Wednesday.

    But the Trump administration has insisted that it has the authority, separate from the president’s executive order, to end programs that it deems counter to U.S. interests. And Republican allies insist the court could not take that power away.

    “We don’t interpret that the court should read that in that way,” said Representative Brian Mast, Republican of Florida and chairman of the foreign affairs panel. “We’re going to continue to fight it.”

    A variety of lawsuits challenging the cuts to the development agency have been working their way through the courts. Wednesday’s ruling was in a case initially brought by the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition and the Journalism Development Network, challenging the administration’s aid freeze as organizations that had been promised those funds.

    But a parallel suit from unions representing U.S.A.I.D. employees was not able to stop the Trump administration from laying off the agency’s contractors and putting the vast majority of direct hires on leave, as part of a plan to reduce the agency’s staffing from about 10,000 to mere hundreds of staff members deemed “essential.”

    Without the majority of its staff, it is unclear how the agency would administer programs if they were restored.

    Judge Ali will hold a hearing on Thursday to consider whether to turn his temporary restraining order largely lifting the administration’s freeze into a more muscular judicial command, a preliminary injunction. He has said that he intends to issue his ruling “with full dispatch.”

    The temporary order is set to expire on Monday or when Judge Ali rules on the motion for a preliminary injunction, whichever comes sooner.

    Should he grant the injunction, the administration will doubtless appeal again, first to a federal appeals court in Washington and then, if need be, to the Supreme Court.

    In the meantime, Mr. Marocco also told lawmakers Wednesday that his staff was planning criminal referrals against individuals the administration believes misused foreign aid funds, according to people familiar with the closed-door meeting.

    Adam Liptak, Stephanie Nolen and Robert Jimison contributed reporting.

  • Trump admin plans to cut more than 70,000 jobs at Department of Veterans Affairs, memo says – CNN

    Trump admin plans to cut more than 70,000 jobs at Department of Veterans Affairs, memo says – CNN

    CNN  — 

    The Trump administration is planning to cut tens of thousands of employees at the Department of Veterans Affairs, according to an internal memo obtained by CNN.

    In a memo dated March 4 addressed to “under secretaries, assistant secretaries, and other key officials,” the Veterans Affairs department’s chief of staff Christopher Syrek said that the VA in partnership with the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, will move “aggressively” to restructure the VA across the entire department and “resize” the workforce.

    As part of that, the department will aim to revert back to its 2019-era staffing levels of 399,957 employees, the memo said. That means more than 70,000 employees could be terminated as part of the restructuring, since the VA employed over 470,000 people as of October 2024, according to the department.

    The memo, which was first reported by Government Executive, says administration and staff offices within the VA will need to conduct information gathering and report back to the Office of Personnel Management by April 14.

    The VA grew significantly under the Biden administration, particularly to help implement the PACT Act that Biden signed into law in 2022 to help expand coverage and eligibility to millions of veterans who were exposed to toxins and hazards like burn pits while serving.

    The national president of the American Federation of Government Employees issued a warning Wednesday about the risks of the planned cuts at the VA.

    “Until Elon Musk and Donald Trump came on the scene, America never turned its back on our veterans and their families,” Everett Kelley said in a statement. “Their reckless plan to wipe out the VA’s ability to deliver on America’s promise to veterans will backfire on millions of veterans and their families who risked their lives in service for our country.”

    The Trump administration has already terminated 2,400 employees at the VA, according to a Tuesday letter addressed to the VA Secretary from two Maine lawmakers, independent Sen. Angus King and Democratic Rep. Jared Golden. The letter expressed “utmost concern” about the lack of a stated reason for the firings and the number of veterans who have been fired.

    “We expect the Trump Administration and the DOGE to uphold its commitment and continue to prioritize the health and well-being of our veterans,” the two wrote.

    The VA’s plans to further cut its workforce come as other federal agencies have fired scores of employees at the direction of OPM, which was until yesterday advising agencies including the Defense Department to fire probationary workers.

    On Tuesday, OPM revised that guidance to say that terminations were now at the discretion of the agencies. But the Pentagon said last month that it plans to ultimately fire five to eight percent of the military’s approximately 950,000 civilian employees, starting with an initial tranche of 5,400 probationary workers who don’t have “mission-critical” roles.

    This story has been updated with additional details.

    CNN’s Rene Marsh and Oren Liebermann contributed to this report.